The technical and economic viability of the re-activation of the Ollomont underground abandoned Cu-mine (Aosta valley – Italy)

Copper and its alloys are nowadays used for many applications required to support energy transition and their market demand is growing. Due to a still limited re-cycling technology is likely that for the next years the request will be mainly covered by the traditional mining of geological deposits or from the reactivation of abandoned mines. The costs of extraction and production of minerals through open-pit or underground extraction activity are given by the direct costs of cultivation (e.g. mining operations) and indirect costs which depend on the characteristics of the ore body, including transport, environmental costs for the reclamation and the security of infrastructures.

In this study, the authors developed the assessment of the technical feasibility and economic viability of the re-activation of the Ollomont underground abandoned Cu-mine (Aosta Valley – Italy). The field is located within a metallogenic province of the Western Alps well defined for the presence of Fe ± Cr, Ni-Co, Cu-Fe, Au, Mn, asbestos and talc. The Ollomont mine insists on banks of pyrite and chalcopyrite located in contact between Prasinites and Calcescists. The cultivation activities involved a mineralized strained layer of cupriferous pyrite. The analysis of the geological documentation allows estimating the reserves of exploitable ore still in place to about 20,000 tons at 0.9 ÷ 1% Cu.

Following parametric analysis on the present market current value the price of Ollomont’s raw copper can be estimated 67 €/t while the total cost of re-starting of the mining activity can be estimated up to 135 €/t (including profits 10%). Therefore, the hypothesis of reopening turns out to be not sustainable at least in the short term and at the current values.

Copper and its alloys are nowadays used for many applications required to support energy transition and their market demand is growing. Due to a still limited re-cycling technology is likely that for the next years the request will be mainly covered by the traditional mining of geological deposits or from the reactivation of abandoned mines. The costs of extraction and production of minerals through open-pit or underground extraction activity are given by the direct costs of cultivation (e.g. mining operations) and indirect costs which depend on the characteristics of the ore body, including transport, environmental costs for the reclamation and the security of infrastructures.

In this study, the authors developed the assessment of the technical feasibility and economic viability of the re-activation of the Ollomont underground abandoned Cu-mine (Aosta Valley – Italy). The field is located within a metallogenic province of the Western Alps well defined for the presence of Fe ± Cr, Ni-Co, Cu-Fe, Au, Mn, asbestos and talc. The Ollomont mine insists on banks of pyrite and chalcopyrite located in contact between Prasinites and Calcescists. The cultivation activities involved a mineralized strained layer of cupriferous pyrite. The analysis of the geological documentation allows estimating the reserves of exploitable ore still in place to about 20,000 tons at 0.9 ÷ 1% Cu.

Following parametric analysis on the present market current value the price of Ollomont’s raw copper can be estimated 67 €/t while the total cost of re-starting of the mining activity can be estimated up to 135 €/t (including profits 10%). Therefore, the hypothesis of reopening turns out to be not sustainable at least in the short term and at the current values.

ISSN 1121-9041

CiteScore:
2020: 3.8
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title.
CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2016-2019) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2016 —19).
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP):
2019: 1.307
SNIP measures contextual citation impact by weighting citations based on the total number of citations in a subject field.
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)
2019: o.657
SJR is a prestige metric based on the idea that not all citations are the same. SJR uses a similar algorithm as the Google page rank; it provides a quantitative and a qualitative measure of the journal's impact.
Journal Metrics: CiteScore: 1.0 , Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.381 SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.163

Supported by


Edited by


GEAM - Associazione Georisorse e Ambiente c/o Dipartimento di Ing.dell’Ambiente, del Territorio e delle infrastrutture Politecnico di Torino
Copyright @ GEAM - Designed by DESIGN GANG - Privacy Policy