Analysis of the valorization opportunities of bottom ash deriving from the incineration of municipal solid waste

In 2017 the production of municipal solid waste in Europe-28 reached 2500 Mt, destined to recycling (48%-wt), incineration and thermal valorization (28%-wt) and landfilling (24%-wt). About 19 Mt per year of residual material, defined bottom ash, were produced by thermo-valorization plants in Europe. Physicochemical features of bottom ashes make possible their treatment through full-scale technologies. Bottom ash treatment is mostly aimed at the recycling of ferrous and non-ferrous metals (in total up to 8%-wt of bottom ash), however also the valorization of the inert fraction as building material could be an interesting opportunity. Nowadays, the main critical issue to solve for the scientific and industrial research is the valorization of the fine fraction of bottom ash, which is rich of hazardous substances and not effectively valorized by conventional methods for metals recovery.

In 2017 the production of municipal solid waste in Europe-28 reached 2500 Mt, destined to recycling (48%-wt), incineration and thermal valorization (28%-wt) and landfilling (24%-wt). About 19 Mt per year of residual material, defined bottom ash, were produced by thermo-valorization plants in Europe. Physicochemical features of bottom ashes make possible their treatment through full-scale technologies. Bottom ash treatment is mostly aimed at the recycling of ferrous and non-ferrous metals (in total up to 8%-wt of bottom ash), however also the valorization of the inert fraction as building material could be an interesting opportunity. Nowadays, the main critical issue to solve for the scientific and industrial research is the valorization of the fine fraction of bottom ash, which is rich of hazardous substances and not effectively valorized by conventional methods for metals recovery.


ISSN 1121-9041

CiteScore:
2020: 3.8
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title.
CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2016-2019) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2016 —19).
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP):
2019: 1.307
SNIP measures contextual citation impact by weighting citations based on the total number of citations in a subject field.
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)
2019: o.657
SJR is a prestige metric based on the idea that not all citations are the same. SJR uses a similar algorithm as the Google page rank; it provides a quantitative and a qualitative measure of the journal's impact.
Journal Metrics: CiteScore: 1.0 , Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.381 SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.163

Supported by


Edited by


GEAM - Associazione Georisorse e Ambiente c/o Dipartimento di Ing.dell’Ambiente, del Territorio e delle infrastrutture Politecnico di Torino
Copyright @ GEAM - Designed by DESIGN GANG - Privacy Policy