Evolution of the concept OS&H from the second Post-war to today: from prescriptive system to Assessment and Management of Risks in system quality – The extended model in collaboration with large Facilities. Evolution of multidisciplinary culture of safety and OS&H.

The management of health and safety at work is represented by the set of preventive and protective measures to minimize the exposure of workers to risks that may cause the onset of diseases or increase the number of accidents.

Data on occupational accidents and diseases reported and recognised by the national insurance agency for accidents and work-related illnesses show, in the last 10 years, a progressive decrease in the number of recognized injuries, especially mortal, and a increase in reports of occupational disease, whose percentage of recognition shows a progressive decline .

The decrease in the number of accidents is only partially related to the spread of the safety culture: in fact, the explanation of this trend also includes a progressive reduction in the number of hours worked, also due to the automation of production, the economic crisis and the relocation. Commuting accidents also decreased, albeit to a lesser extent.

The increase in the number of reports of occupational disease, on the other hand, is secondary to the attribution by the physicians and the working population of an ever-increasing number of multiple-etiology diseases to work-related causes.

In order to further reduce the number of accidents and occupational diseases the occupational physician should take on the role of a “global consultant” who, on the basis of specialized notions, collaborates with the technical company staff.

It is necessary that the healthcare professional collaborates to the implementation of systems for the accident management and investigation, and effectively orient the health surveillance: this goal can be achieved by using the risk assessment data in appropriate way and by executing the clinical investigations suggested by the available scientific evidence.

The management of health and safety at work is represented by the set of preventive and protective measures to minimize the exposure of workers to risks that may cause the onset of diseases or increase the number of accidents.

Data on occupational accidents and diseases reported and recognised by the national insurance agency for accidents and work-related illnesses show, in the last 10 years, a progressive decrease in the number of recognized injuries, especially mortal, and a increase in reports of occupational disease, whose percentage of recognition shows a progressive decline .

The decrease in the number of accidents is only partially related to the spread of the safety culture: in fact, the explanation of this trend also includes a progressive reduction in the number of hours worked, also due to the automation of production, the economic crisis and the relocation. Commuting accidents also decreased, albeit to a lesser extent.

The increase in the number of reports of occupational disease, on the other hand, is secondary to the attribution by the physicians and the working population of an ever-increasing number of multiple-etiology diseases to work-related causes.

In order to further reduce the number of accidents and occupational diseases the occupational physician should take on the role of a “global consultant” who, on the basis of specialized notions, collaborates with the technical company staff.

It is necessary that the healthcare professional collaborates to the implementation of systems for the accident management and investigation, and effectively orient the health surveillance: this goal can be achieved by using the risk assessment data in appropriate way and by executing the clinical investigations suggested by the available scientific evidence.


ISSN 1121-9041

CiteScore:
2020: 3.8
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title.
CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2016-2019) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2016 —19).
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP):
2019: 1.307
SNIP measures contextual citation impact by weighting citations based on the total number of citations in a subject field.
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)
2019: o.657
SJR is a prestige metric based on the idea that not all citations are the same. SJR uses a similar algorithm as the Google page rank; it provides a quantitative and a qualitative measure of the journal's impact.
Journal Metrics: CiteScore: 1.0 , Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.381 SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.163

Supported by


Edited by


GEAM - Associazione Georisorse e Ambiente c/o Dipartimento di Ing.dell’Ambiente, del Territorio e delle infrastrutture Politecnico di Torino
Copyright @ GEAM - Designed by DESIGN GANG - Privacy Policy