The “Carcinogens and Mutagens Directive” and the crystalline silica exposure at work place

The recent directive on the protection of workers from risks related to exposure to carcinogens and mutagens addresses the problem of exposure to crystalline silica.

In view of current scientific knowledge, the directive assigns the role of carcinogen to work processes that generate exposure to crystalline silica in the respirable fraction and not to silica as such. Therefore, this choice does not determine the obligation to classify and label as carcinogenic the products containing more than 0.1% of crystalline silica in the respirable fraction. Considering that the Scientific Committee of Occupational Level defines the silica substance for which a “practical” limit value can be identified, the directive has established an OEL of 0.1 mg / m3. According to the directive, compliance with the limit value does not exempt the application of prevention measures provided for by the directive itself and by national regulations. However, in relation to the available literature data, it is considered possible to identify an action level lower than the OEL whose compliance guarantees a level of protection that does not make it necessary to activate some of the planned actions (replacement and processing in closed systems). At the current state of knowledge, an action level of 0.05 mg / m3 could be indicated.

The recent directive on the protection of workers from risks related to exposure to carcinogens and mutagens addresses the problem of exposure to crystalline silica.

In view of current scientific knowledge, the directive assigns the role of carcinogen to work processes that generate exposure to crystalline silica in the respirable fraction and not to silica as such. Therefore, this choice does not determine the obligation to classify and label as carcinogenic the products containing more than 0.1% of crystalline silica in the respirable fraction. Considering that the Scientific Committee of Occupational Level defines the silica substance for which a “practical” limit value can be identified, the directive has established an OEL of 0.1 mg / m3. According to the directive, compliance with the limit value does not exempt the application of prevention measures provided for by the directive itself and by national regulations. However, in relation to the available literature data, it is considered possible to identify an action level lower than the OEL whose compliance guarantees a level of protection that does not make it necessary to activate some of the planned actions (replacement and processing in closed systems). At the current state of knowledge, an action level of 0.05 mg / m3 could be indicated.


ISSN 1121-9041

CiteScore:
2020: 3.8
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title.
CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2016-2019) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2016 —19).
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP):
2019: 1.307
SNIP measures contextual citation impact by weighting citations based on the total number of citations in a subject field.
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)
2019: o.657
SJR is a prestige metric based on the idea that not all citations are the same. SJR uses a similar algorithm as the Google page rank; it provides a quantitative and a qualitative measure of the journal's impact.
Journal Metrics: CiteScore: 1.0 , Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.381 SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.163

Supported by


Edited by


GEAM - Associazione Georisorse e Ambiente c/o Dipartimento di Ing.dell’Ambiente, del Territorio e delle infrastrutture Politecnico di Torino
Copyright @ GEAM - Designed by DESIGN GANG - Privacy Policy