Validation of numerical D.E.M. modelling of geogrid reinforced embankments for rockfall protection

The adoption of reinforced embankments for rockfall and landslide protection purposes is an effective intervention for the reduction of risk and damages to civil facilities. These earth structures are manufactured with layers of compacted soil alternated with geosynthetics (e.g. geogrids and geotextiles) that are anchored to the outer quarterdeck frame or wrapped around it. This paper discusses the results obtained with a numerical simulation of the reinforced embankment carried out by means of a distinct element commercial (D.E.M.) code as particle code (P.F.C.). Several types of rock impacts on an embankment were simulated, varying block speeds, energies and geometrical impact conditions. Data from practical experiences of the authors and data from full-scale impact tests gathered from relevant literature, were used for the validation of the model. The main result of the work is the development of design operative suggestions that can support the selection of the design parameters of an embankment for rockfall protection purposes: its preliminary size based on impact energy level and induced damages can be outlined. The results of this provide guidance to designers and relevant stakeholders in the evaluation of risk scenarios arising from potential rock falls on infrastructures.

The adoption of reinforced embankments for rockfall and landslide protection purposes is an effective intervention for the reduction of risk and damages to civil facilities. These earth structures are manufactured with layers of compacted soil alternated with geosynthetics (e.g. geogrids and geotextiles) that are anchored to the outer quarterdeck frame or wrapped around it. This paper discusses the results obtained with a numerical simulation of the reinforced embankment carried out by means of a distinct element commercial (D.E.M.) code as particle code (P.F.C.). Several types of rock impacts on an embankment were simulated, varying block speeds, energies and geometrical impact conditions. Data from practical experiences of the authors and data from full-scale impact tests gathered from relevant literature, were used for the validation of the model. The main result of the work is the development of design operative suggestions that can support the selection of the design parameters of an embankment for rockfall protection purposes: its preliminary size based on impact energy level and induced damages can be outlined. The results of this provide guidance to designers and relevant stakeholders in the evaluation of risk scenarios arising from potential rock falls on infrastructures.


ISSN 1121-9041

CiteScore:
2020: 3.8
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title.
CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2016-2019) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2016 —19).
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP):
2019: 1.307
SNIP measures contextual citation impact by weighting citations based on the total number of citations in a subject field.
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)
2019: o.657
SJR is a prestige metric based on the idea that not all citations are the same. SJR uses a similar algorithm as the Google page rank; it provides a quantitative and a qualitative measure of the journal's impact.
Journal Metrics: CiteScore: 1.0 , Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.381 SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.163

Supported by


Edited by


GEAM - Associazione Georisorse e Ambiente c/o Dipartimento di Ing.dell’Ambiente, del Territorio e delle infrastrutture Politecnico di Torino
Copyright @ GEAM - Designed by DESIGN GANG - Privacy Policy